Violent rage expressed by ClimateGate figure at Patrick Michaels for simply pointing out key climate data had been discarded

Patrick Michaels simply mentioned that key ClimateGate data had been discarded. It means there is no "science" behind global warming. This made a global warming "scientist" mad enough to write a ClimateGate email dated 10/9/09. Nobel winner Ben Santer writes Phil Jones that he will "beat the crap" out of Patrick Michaels when he sees him next. Following the email is a newspaper article substantiating discarded data, dated 11/29/09. All ClimateGate and UN climate report data is therefore not science and a massive crime. No one talks about this because it would end the multi-trillion dollar global warming industry and people would rather live a lie.

• 10/9/09, From ClimateGate East Anglia emails,
• "From: Ben Santer

• To: P.Jones

Subject: Re: CEI formal petition to derail EPA GHG endangerment finding with charge that destruction of CRU raw data undermines integrity of global temperature record. Dear Phil,

• ...I'm really sorry that you have to go through all this stuff, Phil. Next time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I'll be tempted

• to beat the crap out of him. Very tempted. I'll help you to deal with Michaels and the CEI in any way that I can.

• The only reason these guys are going after you is because your work is of crucial importance -

it changed the way the world thinks about human effects on climate."...

----------------------------------------------
11/29/09, "Climate change data dumped," TimesOnline UK, by Jonathan Leake
.
"Scientists at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

• It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years. The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was

forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation. The data were gathered from weather stations around the world and then adjusted to take account of variables in the way they were collected. The revised figures were kept, but the originals — stored on paper and magnetic tape —

• were dumped to save space when the CRU moved to a new building."...

-------------------------------------------
Update, 2/15/11, Patrick Michaels, the individual threatened with physical violence, is still in for retaliation from the climate mob for merely stating the truth:

2/15, "Energy and Commerce chairman agrees to review climate skeptic’s industry ties," The Hill, Ben Geman

Global warming propagandist US Rep. Henry Waxman has persuaded apparently wimpy Republican Rep. Fred Upton to look into some of Michael's statements. Organized crime has made billions already in climate carbon trading and they want the fraud to continue. Republicans are pushovers and just want the media to like them, so no problem. ed.



2/15/11 article via Tom Nelson